RefCard
RefCard › Referees › Peter Walton

Peter Walton

Premier League referee · 169 matches · 2003–2012

The Key Match Incidents panel began in 2023-24, after this career, so none of these matches were reviewed by it — there is no error record to show, which is not the same as a clean one. Everything below is a count: RefCard publishes errors, not an accuracy percentage, because no source publishes the denominator such a figure would need.

Season by season

SeasonMatchesFouls/gameYellows/game Reds/gamePenaltiesConfirmed errors
2011-121517.93.000.07—‡—
2010-112720.13.480.26—‡—
2009-102719.72.440.15—‡—
2008-092720.62.480.11—‡—
2007-082421.63.080.12—‡—
2006-071623.83.000.00—‡—
2005-061224.23.080.08—‡—
2004-051625.22.810.06—‡—
2003-04524.01.000.00—‡—

Confirmed errors are only available from 2023-24, when the Key Match Incidents panel began. Earlier seasons show the disciplinary record only. ‡ Penalties are recorded from 2023-24 onward; a dash means the figure was never collected for that season, not that none were given.

Cards and fouls

Not enough Premier League matches to publish a career card rate.

Added time

No second-half added-time record held for this referee yet.

Club by club

Every club refereed at least three times, with that club's own record in those matches and the cards it took.

ClubMatchesW–D–LYellowsPer game
Everton2514–6–5401.60
Liverpool2011–7–2241.20
Bolton196–4–9221.16
Portsmouth176–2–9150.88
Manchester United1711–6–0181.06
Blackburn177–5–5221.29
Fulham165–6–5221.38
West Ham153–6–6201.33
Tottenham148–2–4141.00
Aston Villa144–5–5231.64
Birmingham143–6–5231.64
Wigan143–1–10201.43
Chelsea1310–2–1211.62
Manchester City123–4–5211.75
Arsenal128–4–0151.25
Stoke121–3–8221.83
West Brom112–3–6171.55
Sunderland113–1–7181.64
Wolves102–3–5151.50
Newcastle81–3–4131.62
Middlesbrough81–6–1172.12
Charlton61–4–140.67
Southampton42–1–130.75
Sheffield Utd42–0–261.50
Reading40–2–271.75
Hull41–2–1112.75
Norwich30–2–120.67
Crystal Palace30–2–162.00
Watford30–1–241.33
Derby31–1–182.67

The W–D–L is the club's. Nothing here is evidence of bias — a difference this size is what chance looks like. See how that was measured.